Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

link to other resources #2

Open
arademaker opened this issue Apr 12, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

link to other resources #2

arademaker opened this issue Apr 12, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@arademaker
Copy link

many ontologies have links to different versions of WN. For instance, SUMO (https://github.com/ontologyportal/sumo/tree/master/WordNetMappings). Does it make sense to generalize the idea from this repo making it a general repository for linking WN to other resources?

@ekaf
Copy link
Owner

ekaf commented Apr 13, 2020

Yes, this project's name is "Sense Key Index for inter-operability between WordNet-related projects": the idea is that any WN-related resource can be linked to any other WN version through the SKI. This repo includes examples of combining this approach with ILI identifiers, and it would certainly make sense to also include SUMO.

@arademaker
Copy link
Author

Not only SUMO but many other ontologies could be linked to WN. BFO is one additional example...

@ekaf
Copy link
Owner

ekaf commented Apr 14, 2020

There is an important distinction between databases that already have WordNet identifiers assigned to their entities, like SUMO, OMW, FrameNet, VerbNet (and many others...), and those like BFO that may be linked transitively through an already linked resource.

Any resource that is linked to any WordNet version can use the SKI directly, to get corresponding synsets from any other resource that uses any other WordNet version.

But resources that don't yet have a direct mapping to WordNet cannot use the SKI directly. Still, the SKI may be useful for research and development towards creating the new mappings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants