-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Proposal to use the same framework to predict value #802
Comments
Dear @agronomofiorentini, thanks for a nice suggestion. This is certainly an important addition to the "sits" package. In principle, "sits" could be extended to do prediction as well as classification. We would have to include new methods for training to include continuous Y variables and then change how prediction is done inside the "sits_classify" function. We will look carefully on how to achieve these goals and much time/effort it would take. We wil come back to you as soon as we have a clear position on what to do. |
Move this issue to #1054. |
Dear creators,
First of all, congratulations on developing this framework, which I am using almost daily.
I would like to ask you if in the future you have thought of developing this package to be able to predict numerical values and not only for classification.
I am asking you this because right now I have yield data from a continuous weighted combine harvester and I would like to know if you could use the same framework to be able to train an algorithm to predict yield values from vegetation index data (e.g. NDVI and EVI)
Thanks for your time
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: