-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Docs: Self hosting guidance seems misaligned to license #1015
Comments
Great callout, thank you! Just updated that to:
|
Thanks @steven-tey for being receptive to feedback on this, and for helping to avoid misrepresentation of the AGPL, it is much appreciated! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hello, When browsing the self-hosted docs I noticed the following text:
I don't really see why it specifies a "public GitHub repository"? Especially as you'd be generally cloning it down for local use which is reflected by the command immediately following this, so it seems a bit out of place?
Secondly (I am not a legal expert btw) I don't believe there's anything specifically in the AGPLv3 which requires the source code to remain public, it just needs to be accessible to those that the application is distributed to (where distribution includes web use in that case). If you need to specifically state the distribution requirements for sass offerings (which is what I assume you might be concerned about), i feel a more accurate rendition of this line would be something like:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: