-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RUVSeq DE analysis for data with replicate samples and 4 conditions #7
Comments
Correction:
|
@sharvari14 it doesn't sound like you are reporting an issue with the package. You should be asking on the support site: https://support.bioconductor.org/ . Be sure and tag your question with the package name (RUVSeq). |
Sorry about that. I just posted the question in support.bioconductor.org.. Would appreciate any help. thanks |
Yes, please, post your question on the bioconductor support site. |
Hello Davide, I did post my question on Bioconductor. Would really appreciate if someone Thanks On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Davide Risso [email protected]
|
Sorry, just saw your post. On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 10:14 AM, sharvari gujja [email protected] wrote:
|
Hello,
I have a question on using RUVSeq for removing batch effects for 8 samples of RNA-Seq data - 2 batches with 4 samples each.
The example data in the tutorial shows 2 conditions with 3 replicates each:
https://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/RUVSeq/inst/doc/RUVSeq.pdf
Following the steps in section 3 to estimate factors of unwanted variation using replicate samples, I am trying to define the matrix as:
differences <- matrix(data=c(1:2,3:4,5:6,7:8), byrow=TRUE, nrow=2)
PCA plot for set3 doesn't group the replicates:
However, if I define matrix for pairwise condition as:
The PCA plot for each shows grouping of replicates for the 1st 2 conditions.
Could you please let me know what is the correct approach to remove batch effects from replicates and do DE analysis for pairs of conditions : Control vs. KD and Control75 vs. KD75
Thanks for all the help.
Sharvari
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: