-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NumPy 2.0 support #10221
Comments
cc @hcho3 |
Thank you for the heads up. Will do some tests, I think most of of XGBoost should be fine other than some removed symbols |
Merged
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
NumPy 2.0 is coming out soon ( numpy/numpy#24300 ). NumPy 2.0.0rc1 packages for conda & wheels came out 3 weeks back ( numpy/numpy#24300 (comment) )
To prepare for NumPy 2.0, it might be worthwhile to start testing against NumPy 2 in CI
NumPy has put out a migration guide. More details are in the release notes
If XGBoost make use of NumPy's C API (and produces wheels that use it), having a release of XGBoost with wheels built against NumPy 2.0.0rc1 would be helpful to ensure NumPy 1 & 2 compatible wheels (as wheels built against NumPy 1 won't be compatible with NumPy 2). More details in this NumPy 2 ABI doc
Also as NumPy is tracking ecosystem support for NumPy 2.0, it would be helpful to share XGBoost current support status in issue (with any plans): numpy/numpy#26191
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: