Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

language/type_variable_static_context_negative_test #12161

Closed
scheglov opened this issue Jul 31, 2013 · 0 comments
Closed

language/type_variable_static_context_negative_test #12161

scheglov opened this issue Jul 31, 2013 · 0 comments
Labels
area-test Cross-cutting test issues (use area- labels for specific failures; not used for package:test). closed-stale Closed as the issue or PR is assumed stale type-bug Incorrect behavior (everything from a crash to more subtle misbehavior)

Comments

@scheglov
Copy link
Contributor

It is static warning, not error.
So, this test is not negative.

10 Generics
However, a type parameter is considered to be a malformed type when referenced by a static member.

15.1 Static Types
Any use of a malformed type gives rise to a static warning.
@scheglov scheglov added Type-Defect area-test Cross-cutting test issues (use area- labels for specific failures; not used for package:test). labels Jul 31, 2013
@kevmoo kevmoo added type-bug Incorrect behavior (everything from a crash to more subtle misbehavior) and removed priority-unassigned labels Feb 29, 2016
@lrhn lrhn added the closed-stale Closed as the issue or PR is assumed stale label Aug 19, 2024
@lrhn lrhn closed this as completed Aug 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
area-test Cross-cutting test issues (use area- labels for specific failures; not used for package:test). closed-stale Closed as the issue or PR is assumed stale type-bug Incorrect behavior (everything from a crash to more subtle misbehavior)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@kevmoo @scheglov @lrhn