Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do we want to support old firmware versions? #62

Closed
robinkrahl opened this issue Jan 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Do we want to support old firmware versions? #62

robinkrahl opened this issue Jan 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@robinkrahl
Copy link
Collaborator

robinkrahl commented Jan 12, 2019

I’m currently implementing support for setting the access mode (read-only, read-write) for the Storage. Here we have two issues:

  1. Setting the access mode for the encrypted storage is only supported in firmware version 0.49 (0.50 released on 2018-01-21).
  2. Setting the access mode for the unencrypted storage required the user PIN instead of the admin PIN in firmware versions 0.50, 0.48 and below (0.51 released on 2018-06-14).

Do we want to support the old behavior? On the one hand, it is code that I cannot test, and there is no technical reason not to upgrade the firmware. On the other hand, people might not want to update the firmware unless required, especially as the process can be tricky for new users.

I think it is reasonable not to support old firmware versions, especially if they are older than 6 months (as in this case). Do you agree?

Edit: Of course I’m only talking about the Storage where users can upgrade the firmware. For the Pro, we should support as many firmware versions as possible.

@d-e-s-o
Copy link
Owner

d-e-s-o commented Jan 12, 2019

Oh yeah, I noticed that too.

I think it is reasonable not to support old firmware versions, especially if they are older than 6 months (as in this case). Do you agree?

Yeah, I don't consider that a big problem.

@robinkrahl
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Okay, I documented the outdated functions as not supported.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants