-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Build reproducibility test #109
Comments
Debian packages are automatically tested for build reproducibility, and
as far as I see, nitrocli is reproducible [1]. Note that the Debian
Rust packaging software, debcargo [2] and dh-cargo [3], made some
special provisions to make the builds reproducible. For example, the
build path is embedded into the binary per default [4].
[1] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/rust-nitrocli.html
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/debcargo
[3] https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/dh-cargo
[4] https://salsa.debian.org/rust-team/dh-cargo/-/commit/089cf441f4a7b111ab56f3540bc8465536c9e08e
|
Thanks Robin! I am closing this issue as it seems that no action is required. @szszszsz please let me know if there is something else missing. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi!
Have you tried to confirm build reproducibility [2] with nitrocli? I wanted to do so using reprotest [1], however Rust does not seem to be supported well by it (I got toolchain-related errors despite multiple attempts to fix that [3]). I saw that there is a new tool used to confirm packages' build reproducibility for Arch Linux, and seemed to work with Rust packages, but I cannot find it right now unfortunately.
I will probably revisit this problem in some time.
[1] https://pypi.org/project/reprotest/
[2] reproducible-builds.org/
[3]
rust build error: no default toolchain configured
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: