Support cycleway:*:oneway

[Phyks]

We are currently supporting oneway tag on highway=cycleway. The same scheme should be extended to support cycleway:left|right:oneway=no.

[Florimondable]

Please don't add on default cycleway (so oneway) an arrow.

[Phyks]

Please don't add on default cycleway (so oneway) an arrow.

We are already doing it on highway=cycleway + oneway=yes: https://cyclosm.github.io/cyclosm-cartocss-style/example.html#18/48.82399/2.32594.

[Florimondable]

And I'm the guy who did that.

[Phyks]

I'm not sure what to do with this. Most of the cycleway:left|right:oneway are living on lane or share_busway. We render these with dots and I'm not sure it would be really nice to have an arrow on top of the dots.

@Florimondable what do you think about using a pattern on the casing to have a very slight arrow for the direction? Something like (very subtle)

Track would keep the arrow just as a separate highway=cycleway would (but tracks are a minority in this scheme, about 1k worldwide).

[Florimondable]

That's smart !

But never felt the need to have that feature, so is it necessary for me ? No.
Though I know some weird cases where it would be good to know the the direction of the lane https://www.google.fr/maps/@48.8435905,2.4577221,3a,75y,301.05h,73.66t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sHSKW06zdC09DvA2lZ6ROrA!2e0!7i16384!8i8192
(The openstreetmap on that case is not good in my opinion.)

[Phyks]

Here is my current render at Z18 and beyond.

https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=19/48.84960/2.36974

https://www.cyclosm.org/#19/48.79724/2.15395

https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=18/48.82589/2.32857/cyclosm

Left to do:

• cycleway:*:oneway=no
• cycleway:left|right=track

[Phyks]

Bidirectional cycleways tagged on main highway are now larger as well.

https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=18/48.80099/2.43625/cyclosm

[Phyks]

Done for tracks. https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=18/48.82637/2.32988

[Florimondable]

not sure to understand why this one is not rendered oriented https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/64609509 but this one is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25469382
https://www.cyclosm.org/#map=20/48.87709/2.36359/cyclosm

[Phyks]

I'm only rendering cycleway:left|right:oneway and cycleway:left|right=opposite_* so far. You are right, I should include direction for these as well.

We just have to be careful about cycleway:both=* for which we should not render any arrows (depends on left or right hand side driving). I'd still render an arrow for cycleway=* to make the distinction clear and improve tagging.

[Florimondable]

You are right, I should include direction for these as well.
I didn't say that, it was just to understand.
Nevertheless may be we should render them, didn't think it through yet.

[Phyks]

I think everything is fine for this in the code currently. Reopen if I missed anything.