You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Only has a single numeric type. Not the most ideal for byte manipulation.
Rhai
Slower than Lua
Has i64 system integer type, but other types are exposed as "custom" types, and working with them is both harder and slower than i64
Wasm (wasmtime?)
Would probably be as fast, or even faster than Lua
Couldn't edit/compile inside hexerator. Major disadvantage.
Ideal candidate would:
Support all rust primitives (i8, u8, i16, u16, i32, u32, i64, u64, f32, f64, etc.)
Be about as fast, or faster than Lua
Optionally, could be fed a byte slice as argument, without having to clone the data
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
crumblingstatue
added
the
Open ended
Issues that need lots of thinking and trying out different options before coming to a conclusion.
label
Sep 3, 2022
i64
system integer type, but other types are exposed as "custom" types, and working with them is both harder and slower thani64
Ideal candidate would:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: