Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Poll: should fnpct keep the \mult... variants? #21

Closed
cgnieder opened this issue Dec 24, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Poll: should fnpct keep the \mult... variants? #21

cgnieder opened this issue Dec 24, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@cgnieder
Copy link
Owner

fnpct defines ´\multfootnoteand similar commands. They are not really necessary becausefnpctalso reliably detects following notes like\footnote{aaa}\footnote{bbb}` and inserts a separator between them.

Actually, in the current implementation \multfootnote{aaa;bbb} simply expands into \footnote{aaa}\footnote{bbb}.

Should fnpct keep these variants? And why?

/polls 'yes' 'no'
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cgnieder