-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
New Standard Names: Wildland Fire Indexes #166
Comments
Dear Lee @akessenich Thanks for your proposals. Since these are well-defined conventional quantities and you have described what they are about, I think it's fine to give them standard names if these definitions are fixed - are they? Data can be archived for a long time, and it would be problematic if the definitions changed after archive. The first three names look OK to me. The next four are all components of the US National Fire Danger Rating System, and I guess the last one is also a US index, is it? The names you have proposed for these are rather general, and it would be better to be more informative about provenance, as you have with the first three, by adding some prefix that identifies them as US fire indices. I would also suggest that you add Best wishes Jonathan |
Dear Jonathan @JonathanGregory KBDI, mFFWI, CFWI, and SFDI have fixed definitions. The NFDRS indexes involve modeling of fuels and vegetation, and the recommendations about how to do that can change (and in fact they recently underwent a major update), but the meaning of the indexes is fixed. The end results are measures of fuel dryness (FM100 & FM1000), fire intensity (ERC), and flame length (BI). We can add the prefix Agreed also that we should remove With regard to adding an It appears that the meaning of Burning Index as a measure of flame length is getting lost in the text, so we can move that to the front of the definition. (Flame length is highly relevant to fire management because it affects the safety of firefighters and aerial support. It is a function of fire intensity and speed of spread. Would it be helpful to add that information to the definition?) The Severe Fire Danger Index is not officially a part of the NFDRS but is intended as a supplement to it. Here are updated versions of the definitions: - Term: keetch_byram_drought_index (unchanged from original post) - Term: modified_fosberg_fire_weather_index (unchanged from original post) - Term: canadian_fire_weather_index (unchanged from original post) - Term: NFDRS_100_hour_fuel_moisture - Term: NFDRS_1000_hour_fuel_moisture - Term: NFDRS_energy_release_component - Term: NFDRS_burning_index - Term: severe_fire_danger_index (unchanged from original post) |
Dear Lee Thanks for these changes. Standard names don't contain upper case so the prefix should be The severe fire danger index is not from NFDRS but it would still be good to add a prefix, since it otherwise sounds generic. Maybe we could prefix Best wishes Jonathan |
Thank you for your feedback again, Jonathan. Here are updated versions of the definitions: - Term: keetch_byram_drought_index (unchanged from original post) - Term: modified_fosberg_fire_weather_index (unchanged from original post) - Term: canadian_fire_weather_index (unchanged from original post) - Term: nfdrs_100_hour_fuel_moisture - Term: nfdrs_1000_hour_fuel_moisture - Term: nfdrs_energy_release_component - Term: nfdrs_burning_index - Term: nfdrs_severe_fire_danger_index (unchanged from original post) |
Thanks very much, Lee @akessenich. It looks fine to me now. I expect Alison @japamment will comment in due course on adding these names to the table. |
Just wanted to mention that some of these variables are also defined in WMO GRIB2 (see table below). I only see a difference with the units of "Energy Release Component", "unitless" vs "J/m2", otherwise it seems relatively coherent. Code table 4.2
|
@sebvi |
Dear Lee @akessenich and Sebastien @sebvi If the energy release component is really not dimensionless, but actually in
Cheers Jonathan |
Thank you Jonathan for clarifying. - Term: nfdrs_energy_release_component |
Hi! There's been no further discussion of these names for considerably more than 7 days. Can they be accepted and added to the standard name table? |
As @sethmcg says, I think these are fine. Please could Alison @japamment or Fran @feggleton take a look? Thanks. |
Hi all, thanks for the prompt. Just looking at the terms, I don't know much about this topic but reading about the Canadian Fire Weather Index, I wonder whether it should be just Fire Weather Index. After reading: The Fire Weather Index is a component of the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index (FWI) System. For nfdrs_100_hour_fuel_moisture please ensure NFDRS is in brackets next to the words in the definition. I think the only fire phrases we have in the CF SN table are fire_area which doesn't apply to any of these terms so that's fine. @japamment please confirm you're happy with the definitions here and I think these can be accepted. |
Hi Francesca, |
Yes that is a fair point. Thanks. @japamment If there are no further comments from your side in the next 5 days we can accept this (as i added the label 2 days ago) |
@feggleton @japamment - These standard_names were all accepted back in November, but they still haven't shown up in the Standard Name table, which was last updated a week ago. What do we need to do to move this issue forward? |
This issue has had no activity in the last 30 days. This is a reminder to please comment on standard name requests to assist with agreement and acceptance. Standard name moderators are also reminded to review @feggleton @japamment |
Apologies for the delay on these terms @sethmcg. I have now added all of these into the cfeditor and they will be in the next update on Monday. |
Great to hear! Thanks very much! |
These terms are in version 81 of the table, @akessenich. Thanks, @feggleton @japamment. |
This is a group of terms describing wildland fire conditions. They are compiled from a variety of sources in North America and are not new terms, but have not been assigned CF names. This work is related to the NA-CORDEX archive and supported by NSF Growing Convergence Research.
Proposer's Name: Lee Kessenich, National Center for Atmospheric Research
Date: July 19, 2022
- Term: keetch_byram_drought_index
- Description: The Keetch Byram Drought Index (KBDI) is a numerical drought index ranging from 0 to 800 that estimates the cumulative moisture deficiency in soil. It is a cumulative index. It is a function of maximum temperature and precipitation over the previous 24 hours.
- Units: unitless
- Term: modified_fosberg_fire_weather_index
- Description: The modified Fosberg Fire Weather Index (mFFWI) is a measure of the potential effect of weather conditions on wildland fire. The Fosberg Fire Weather Index is a function of temperature, wind, and humidity. It is modified with a fuel availability factor based on the Keetch Byram Drought Index.
- Units: unitless
- Term: canadian_fire_weather_index
- Description: The Canadian Fire Weather Index (CFWI) is a numerical rating of potential frontal fire intensity from the Canadian Forest Fire Index System. It indicates fire intensity by combining the rate of spread with the amount of fuel being consumed and is also used for general public information about fire danger conditions. It is a function of wind speed, temperature, relative humidity, and precipitation. The calculation accounts for multiple layers of flammable material on the ground as well as fine fuels above the surface, combined with the expected rate of spread of fire. The index is open ended.
- Units: unitless
- Term: 100_hour_fuel_moisture_content
- Description: 100 hour fuel moisture (FM100) represents the modeled moisture content of dead fuels in the 1 to 3 inch diameter class. It can also be used as a very rough estimate of the average moisture content of the forest floor from three-fourths inch to 4 inches below the surface. The 100-hour timelag fuel moisture is a function of length of day (as influenced by latitude and calendar date), maximum and minimum temperature and relative humidity, and precipitation duration in the previous 24 hours. It is a component in the US National Fire Danger Rating System. The US National Fire Danger Rating System comprises several numeric indexes that rate the potential over a large area for wildland fires to ignite, spread, and require action to suppress or manage. It was designed for use in the continental United States, and all its components are relative, not absolute.
- Units: %
- Term: 1000_hour_fuel_moisture_content
- Description: 1000 hour fuel moisture (FM1000) represents the modeled moisture content in the dead fuels in the 3 to 8 inch diameter class and the layer of the forest floor about 4 inches below the surface. The value is based on a running 7-day average. The 1000-hour timelag fuel moisture is a function of length of day (as influenced by latitude and calendar date), daily temperature and relative humidity extremes (maximum and minimum values) and the 24-hour precipitation duration values for a 7-day period. It is a component in the US National Fire Danger Rating System. The US National Fire Danger Rating System comprises several numeric indexes that rate the potential over a large area for wildland fires to ignite, spread, and require action to suppress or manage. It was designed for use in the continental United States, and all its components are relative, not absolute.
- Units: %
- Term: energy_release_component
- Description: The Energy Release Component (ERC) is a number related to the available energy (BTU) per unit area (square foot) within the flaming front at the head of a fire. Daily variations in ERC are due to changes in moisture content of the various fuels present, both live and dead. It may also be considered a composite fuel moisture value as it reflects the contribution that all live and dead fuels have to potential fire intensity. Energy Release Component is a cumulative index. The scale is open-ended and relative. Energy Release Component values depend on the fuel model input into the calculations and interpretation of precise values varies with ecology and region. It is an index in the US National Fire Danger Rating System. The US National Fire Danger Rating System comprises several numeric indexes that rate the potential over a large area for wildland fires to ignite, spread, and require action to suppress or manage. It was designed for use in the continental United States, and all its components are relative, not absolute.
- Units: unitless [while it is related to BTU/ft^2, the scale of ERC is relative to location and fuel model in ways that do not translate directly, especially in the field]
- Term: burning_index
- Description: The Burning Index (BI) is a number related to the contribution of fire behavior to the effort of containing a fire. The BI is derived from a combination of Spread and Energy Release Components. The Spread Component is a rating of the forward rate of spread of a headfire and wind is a key input. Burning Index is expressed as a numeric value closely related to the flame length in feet multiplied by 10. The scale is open ended which allows the range of numbers to adequately define fire problems, even in time of low to moderate fire danger. Computed BI values represent the near upper limit to be expected on the rating area. In other words, if a fire occurs in the worst fuel, weather and topography conditions of the rating area, these numbers indicate its expected fireline intensities and flame length. It is an index in the US National Fire Danger Rating System. The US National Fire Danger Rating System comprises several numeric indexes that rate the potential over a large area for wildland fires to ignite, spread, and require action to suppress or manage. It was designed for use in the continental United States, and all its components are relative, not absolute.
- Units: unitless [while this is "closely related to" the flame length in feet, it is not exact and is not treated as such in the field]
- Term: severe_fire_danger_index
- Description: Severe Fire Danger Index (SFDI) is the normalized product of normalized Energy Release Component (ERC) and normalized Burning Index (BI) from the National Fire Danger Rating System (NFDRS). It is commonly categorized into five classes based on percentile: low (0-60), moderate (60-80), high (80-90), very high (90-97), and extreme (97-100). It can be extended to future conditions by introducing an unprecedented category for values above the historical 100th percentile. As it is locally normalized, its interpretation remains the same across space.
- Units: unitless [though technically a percentile, when applied to future models, this breaks down when "unprecedented" conditions are assigned values higher than 100 percent.]
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: