Latest tag is  v2.0.0
Comparing v2.0.0 with current on Node v6.2.2
--------------------------------------
each(10) v2.0.0 x 61,429 ops/sec ±0.47% (28 runs sampled), 0.0163ms per run
each(10) current x 73,966 ops/sec ±0.56% (31 runs sampled), 0.0135ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
each(300) v2.0.0 x 6,581 ops/sec ±0.44% (31 runs sampled), 0.152ms per run
each(300) current x 8,130 ops/sec ±1.66% (32 runs sampled), 0.123ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
each(10000) v2.0.0 x 180 ops/sec ±3.00% (31 runs sampled), 5.57ms per run
each(10000) current x 263 ops/sec ±0.28% (32 runs sampled), 3.80ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
map(10) v2.0.0 x 60,832 ops/sec ±0.36% (30 runs sampled), 0.0164ms per run
map(10) current x 69,232 ops/sec ±0.29% (31 runs sampled), 0.0144ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
map(300) v2.0.0 x 6,096 ops/sec ±1.62% (33 runs sampled), 0.164ms per run
map(300) current x 7,150 ops/sec ±0.23% (32 runs sampled), 0.140ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
map(10000) v2.0.0 x 139 ops/sec ±2.51% (30 runs sampled), 7.20ms per run
map(10000) current x 184 ops/sec ±3.49% (30 runs sampled), 5.43ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
eachOf(10) v2.0.0 x 68,865 ops/sec ±1.55% (30 runs sampled), 0.0145ms per run
eachOf(10) current x 73,789 ops/sec ±1.49% (32 runs sampled), 0.0136ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
eachOf(300) v2.0.0 x 6,894 ops/sec ±0.24% (32 runs sampled), 0.145ms per run
eachOf(300) current x 8,309 ops/sec ±1.74% (31 runs sampled), 0.120ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
eachOf(10000) v2.0.0 x 178 ops/sec ±2.81% (31 runs sampled), 5.60ms per run
eachOf(10000) current x 264 ops/sec ±0.58% (32 runs sampled), 3.79ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
parallel(10) v2.0.0 x 57,496 ops/sec ±2.53% (29 runs sampled), 0.0174ms per run
parallel(10) current x 62,872 ops/sec ±3.27% (28 runs sampled), 0.0159ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
parallel(100) v2.0.0 x 14,082 ops/sec ±1.86% (29 runs sampled), 0.0710ms per run
parallel(100) current x 16,296 ops/sec ±0.30% (32 runs sampled), 0.0614ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
parallel(1000) v2.0.0 x 1,693 ops/sec ±1.86% (31 runs sampled), 0.591ms per run
parallel(1000) current x 1,971 ops/sec ±2.16% (30 runs sampled), 0.507ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
some - no short circuit- false(500) v2.0.0 x 3,277 ops/sec ±0.13% (31 runs sampled), 0.305ms per run
some - no short circuit- false(500) current x 3,822 ops/sec ±2.87% (30 runs sampled), 0.262ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
some - short circuit - true(500) v2.0.0 x 3,376 ops/sec ±0.45% (31 runs sampled), 0.296ms per run
some - short circuit - true(500) current x 3,933 ops/sec ±2.19% (30 runs sampled), 0.254ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
every - no short circuit- true(500) v2.0.0 x 3,343 ops/sec ±0.94% (30 runs sampled), 0.299ms per run
every - no short circuit- true(500) current x 3,838 ops/sec ±3.70% (31 runs sampled), 0.261ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
every - short circuit - false(500) v2.0.0 x 3,339 ops/sec ±0.91% (31 runs sampled), 0.300ms per run
every - short circuit - false(500) current x 3,874 ops/sec ±3.08% (30 runs sampled), 0.258ms per run
current is faster
--------------------------------------
current faster overall (15.1ms total vs. 20.8ms total)
current won more benchmarks (16 vs. 0)