Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Generate architecture drawings based on relationships #15

Open
happymcplaksin opened this issue Mar 28, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

Generate architecture drawings based on relationships #15

happymcplaksin opened this issue Mar 28, 2017 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@happymcplaksin
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@happymcplaksin happymcplaksin added this to the 1.5 milestone Mar 28, 2017
@happymcplaksin happymcplaksin self-assigned this Mar 28, 2017
@tminor
Copy link
Contributor

tminor commented Jan 23, 2020

I think I understand the intention here, but for the sake of clarity, do you mean that 🍜 should be able to generate something like Mermaid markup to represent relationships between nodes?

@happymcplaksin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Short answer: Yes.

Longer: This issue is really a catch-all. It's not crystal clear to me whether the functionality belongs in Noodle itself, or in an external script/use of Noodle. For example, the (internal) SCRIMP ideas are all about using Noodle in a certain way . However, it might make sense to include a design and implementation inside or along with Noodle itself.

PS: Ha! 🍜 is excellent.

@tminor
Copy link
Contributor

tminor commented Jan 24, 2020

I've had many pie-in-sky type ideas about how to make noodle flexible enough to accommodate potentially complex internodal relationships (dependencies, hierarchies, etc.). So while it'd be fair to say "making drawings doesn't belong in noodle," I'm a big fan of representing such relationships in a way that could be easily consumed elsewhere. The aforementioned ideas have been 100% devoid of detail, but they're fun to consider.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants