Subjail names, take 2 #2
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Also adds some more comments. Problem/solution originally presented by @egwynn in GitHub PR#1
austinhyde
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 8, 2015
Match jail names from the jls list, rather than deriving the jail name
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As @egwynn brought up in PR #1, this is an attempt to fix how the plugin mangles names with dots in it.
With this change, the jail given in the inventory host is matched against both jail names and hostnames from the result of
jls jid name host.hostname path, rather than attempting to derive the jail name from what was given in the ansible host.