Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Has development moved to inside Unity? #650

Closed
mikeskydev opened this issue Oct 9, 2023 · 5 comments
Closed

Has development moved to inside Unity? #650

mikeskydev opened this issue Oct 9, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@mikeskydev
Copy link

mikeskydev commented Oct 9, 2023

Hi, I've been keeping a track on development of the internal fork of glTFast Unity uses (https://docs.unity3d.com/Packages/com.unity.cloud.gltfast@latest)

I notice that there hasn't been much activity here, but the Unity fork has since released 5.1, 5.2 and 6.0.

Has development moved internally to Unity now, is this repo no longer the main source?

I would love to have some of the features listed in the Unity changelogs publicly available, especially the extensions API for #226

@atteneder
Copy link
Owner

Yes, development continued on an internal fork. We're working on getting those improvements into the hands of the public again (and also on this repository).
Feel free to subscribe to this issue and watch out for an update in the upcoming weeks.

@mikeskydev
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the info! Is the Unity fork going to be the primary source going forward, and therefore is there any way to have PRs accepted now? While I understand work may progress faster internally, it seems a little odd to not be building in public like before, either in this repo or the existing public Unity fork.

@atteneder
Copy link
Owner

TL;DR: Yes, we'll keep on accepting PRs.

Once we roll things out, there will be a guide how to submit PRs, preferably targetting the Unity fork where changes will be synced to this repo and the OpenUPM release. Sorry for the delayed review on existing PRs.
As much as I'd love to keep things simple, considering all the internal and external requirements and limitations, setting up a good devops workflow is not straight forward.

@sambaas
Copy link

sambaas commented Oct 31, 2023

@atteneder We are considering writing support for some Cesium extentions. Would it be smart for us to wait for this reworked Unity fork to go live?

@atteneder
Copy link
Owner

@sambaas Yes, I expect repos to sync within next week.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants