Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

exception while running #8

Closed
jeras opened this issue Jan 31, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

exception while running #8

jeras opened this issue Jan 31, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@jeras
Copy link

jeras commented Jan 31, 2018

Tried to run version 0.3.0 on Ubuntu 17.10 with the command line for server without authentication:

$ sudo ./lfs_server.sh -verbose -s localhost -p 8080
Uncaught exception:
  
  (Unix.Unix_error "Illegal seek" sysconf "")

Raised by primitive operation at file "src/core_unix.ml", line 347, characters 14-29
@artemkin artemkin added the bug label Feb 1, 2018
@artemkin
Copy link
Owner

artemkin commented Feb 1, 2018

It seems Ocaml core library doesn't correctly handle sysconf result with glibc-2.26 janestreet/core#95. Let me prepare a new release.

@jeras
Copy link
Author

jeras commented Feb 1, 2018

Thanks artemkin, I will test the new release later today.

@jeras
Copy link
Author

jeras commented Feb 1, 2018

Hi @artemkin, the issue is fixed now, the server started properly. Thanks.
But I found out I do not know how to integrate it with a git repo.

My intention was to use it to run some LFS tests, but I kind of lost interest, sorry.

Right now it seems Microsoft GVFS might be a better choice, since as I understand it keeps all files in a central server repo, instead of using a separate location. This makes it easier to move the server side repository without loosing data.
Unfortunately GVFS is only available on Windows, although server side MS and Bitbucket should have some support.

Another thing that would make sense for my usage cases is file locking, I quickly tried what is provided on GitHub, I suspect you did not implement it yet.

So for now I will probably stick to standard git and continue evaluating when some progress is made by server providers (GitLab, Bitbucket), and ...

@jeras jeras closed this as completed Feb 1, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants