Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃殌 Feature: MessagePack support in Functions #5256

Open
2 tasks done
cselti opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks done

馃殌 Feature: MessagePack support in Functions #5256

cselti opened this issue Mar 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
product / functions Fixes and upgrades for the Appwrite Functions.

Comments

@cselti
Copy link

cselti commented Mar 20, 2023

馃敄 Feature description

The communication between clients and functions can be more efficient if there is support for MessagePack binary serialization format.

馃帳 Pitch

I would like to send binary data between the client and functions (uploading a sound file and the response is a sound file too) - it can be achieved only Base64 encoding, but this is not efficient. The gRPC could be an option, but this is not available yet.

馃憖 Have you spent some time to check if this issue has been raised before?

  • I checked and didn't find similar issue

馃彚 Have you read the Code of Conduct?

@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 added the product / functions Fixes and upgrades for the Appwrite Functions. label Mar 20, 2023
@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 self-assigned this Mar 20, 2023
@stnguyen90
Copy link
Contributor

@cselti, thanks for raising this issue! 馃檹馃徏 We plan to improve the request and response formats in an upcoming release. Please follow this discussion and stay tuned!

@stnguyen90 stnguyen90 assigned Meldiron and unassigned stnguyen90 Mar 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
product / functions Fixes and upgrades for the Appwrite Functions.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants