docs: confusing duplication for Kconfig in custom app

[sumpfralle]

Source: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/blob/master/Documentation/guides/customapps.rst#12-kconfig

The above section contains the following text:

In the minimum case, Kconfig is only:

    .. code-block:: console
      # For a description of the syntax of this configuration file,
      # see the file kconfig-language.txt in the NuttX tools repository.
      #
or

    .. code-block:: console
      # For a description of the syntax of this configuration file,
      # see the file kconfig-language.txt in the NuttX tools repository.
      #

The above looks like an accidental copy of the same text.

Probably the author intended to provide a hint for some other kind of minimal usage?

[simbit18]

I think it is an accidental text copy of the old documentation Custom Application Directories

[xiaoxiang781216]

@sumpfralle could you provide a patch to fix it.

[sumpfralle]

@sumpfralle could you provide a patch to fix it.

I would certainly do this. But I am afraid, that I do not know, which alternative Kconfig content the author had in mind.
The above link to the old wiki content contained only the currently duplicated text.

Of course I could just submit a PR, which removes the duplicate text. Should I do that?

[xiaoxiang781216]

Yes, I think so.

[acassis]

@sumpfralle looking the original Custom Application Directories as @simbit18 pointed it seems like @TimJTi was trying to include two options for that minimum Kconfig. Although the original article said that the Kconfig doesn't need to have any meaning text, I think it is not true. Normally the Kconfig should have an entry with the symbol of the application config, a user friend name/text that will be presented at menuconfig and a help text with information about that application.

[TimJTi]

I will revisit this documentation - I added it after I found it very difficult myself to set up custom apps and custom boards but looks Like I made some errors. Sorry!

It will be a week or two before I will have the time, but I would be happy to do this.

[TimJTi]

PR