Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Architectural Decisions" to strengthen "Architecturally Significant" #134

Closed
koppor opened this issue Jun 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed
Milestone

Comments

@koppor
Copy link
Member

koppor commented Jun 2, 2024

Short: We think to revert #41 to strengthen "Architecturally Significant".

  • "Any": Too broad
  • "Architectural": Maybe too narrow?

Is going back to "Markdown Architectural Decision Records" a good idea?

@koppor koppor added this to the Version 4.0.0 milestone Jun 2, 2024
@koppor
Copy link
Member Author

koppor commented Jun 2, 2024

Note: spotify backstage uses docs/architecture-decisions as path.

@jonthenerd
Copy link

For what it's worth, I think it's relevant to keep MADR related to architecture. Architecture implies significance. Going through the labor of establishing a decision record is really only warranted when that decision will have a significant impact. Hence, why you wouldn't do it for "any" decision. While you could you probably shouldn't and most wouldn't.

@koppor
Copy link
Member Author

koppor commented Aug 26, 2024

IMHO, we changed everything in our developer branch, we need to check.

@koppor koppor closed this as completed Sep 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants