Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Artifact Automation #2

Open
jon-bell opened this issue Nov 24, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Artifact Automation #2

jon-bell opened this issue Nov 24, 2019 · 2 comments
Labels
policy An issue about refining a policy

Comments

@jon-bell
Copy link
Collaborator

Should an artifact automatically generate any tables/graphs that appear in a paper, or is it OK (or, perhaps even better, given the potential for mistakes in these scripts) for this to be a somewhat manual process?

@jon-bell jon-bell added the policy An issue about refining a policy label Nov 24, 2019
@sbaltes
Copy link

sbaltes commented Nov 30, 2019

Regardless of whether the process is manual, semi-automatic, or automatic, it should be documented in a way that allows reviewers to understand and reproduce how the tables/graphs were created from the data to be able to verify their correctness.

@piskachev
Copy link

I think the "call for artifacts" should encourage the authors to make the steps automatic as much as possible. However, for manual steps, authors should be aware that reviewers should understand the artifact and judge its quality in a "reasonable" amount of time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
policy An issue about refining a policy
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants