You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The filter tab does not yet include the third level of filtering.
Before implementing this, let's double check with the TADA Working Group to make sure this functionality is needed in Module 1.
Describe the solution you'd like
For example, with the third level of filtering, a user could first select "CharacteristicName", then a specific characteristic from the list. Then they could review and filter data only for that specified characteristic. One example might be to filter within a single characteristic by media subdivision, or by the sample methodology used. Unique values for media subdivision, or the sample methodology could be nested or in a fourth level. See TADA Mock Ups.
Alternatively, users may want to filter at each level by other groupings. For example, see groupings in the WQPDataProfile tab in the All-TADA-Templates.xlsx
We could facilitate review of metadata based on its type, i.e., QAQC, depth profile, time, site, organization, media, etc....
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
The filter tab does not yet include the third level of filtering.
Before implementing this, let's double check with the TADA Working Group to make sure this functionality is needed in Module 1.
Describe the solution you'd like
For example, with the third level of filtering, a user could first select "CharacteristicName", then a specific characteristic from the list. Then they could review and filter data only for that specified characteristic. One example might be to filter within a single characteristic by media subdivision, or by the sample methodology used. Unique values for media subdivision, or the sample methodology could be nested or in a fourth level. See TADA Mock Ups.
Additional context
See Filter and WQPDataProfile tabs
Suggested fields to include in characteristic level filtering:
ActivityCommentText
ActivityTypeCode
ActivityMediaName
ActivityMediaSubdivisionName
MeasureQualifierCode
MonitoringLocationTypeName
HydrologicCondition
HydrologicEvent
ResultStatusIdentifier
MethodQualifierTypeName
ResultCommentText
ResultLaboratoryCommentText
ResultMeasure/MeasureUnitCode
ResultSampleFractionText
ResultTemperatureBasisText
ResultValueTypeName
ResultWeightBasisText
SampleCollectionEquipmentName
LaboratoryName
MethodDescriptionText
ResultParticleSizeBasisText
SampleCollectionMethod/MethodIdentifier
SampleCollectionMethod/MethodIdentifierContext
SampleCollectionMethod/MethodName
DataQuality/BiasValue
MethodSpeciationName
ResultAnalyticalMethod/MethodName
ResultAnalyticalMethod/MethodIdentifier
ResultAnalyticalMethod/MethodIdentifierContext
AssemblageSampledName
CharacteristicNameUserSupplied
DetectionQuantitationLimitTypeName
StatisticalBaseCode
Suggested fields to include in full dataset filtering:
ActivityTypeCode
ActivityMediaName
ActivityMediaSubdivisionName
ActivityCommentText
MonitoringLocationTypeName
StateName
TribalLandName
OrganizationFormalName
CharacteristicName
HydrologicCondition
HydrologicEvent
BiologicalIntentName
MeasureQualifierCode
ActivityGroup
AssemblageSampledName
ProjectName
CharacteristicNameUserSupplied
DetectionQuantitationLimitTypeName
SampleTissueAnatomyName
LaboratoryName
Alternatively, users may want to filter at each level by other groupings. For example, see groupings in the WQPDataProfile tab in the All-TADA-Templates.xlsx
We could facilitate review of metadata based on its type, i.e., QAQC, depth profile, time, site, organization, media, etc....
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: