-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Consider using FASTER #201
Comments
Thanks for raising the issue @Xhanti ! I haven't had to deal with a cache with millions of items, especially a file cache. Good idea though about having a cache layer around FASTER. I can't promise anything but it is something I think would be interesting to try out soon. Might be able to give it a look through it in a few weeks time. Whether it becomes an official cache layer or not, you can experiment yourself with Cache Tower + FASTER by creating your own cache layers too. |
Thanks for feedback. Just an FYI. Looks like a promising project |
Have you guys considered using something like https://github.com/microsoft/FASTER for the file based cache? A file per cache item makes the file cache not a good fit for a project at work. We have millions of items in the cache and it runs on windows. There would be performance degradation getting a cache item in a folder with millions of items.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: