-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 80
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Benchmark SleekDB #214
Comments
Hi @REDAL |
@Timu57 |
@REDAL are you kidding me? I never see this post when I did my benchmarks test! it is incredible that you proposed the benchmark and 3hr later I was testing the package for my own haha I'm surprised! |
it's not important who proposed first my friend, the idea, is to make it better ;) and I appreciate your work really, and I did make a request if you wish of course ;) |
hahaha no no @REDAL I'm just saying it's incredible the coincidence of thinking the same thing almost at the same time, I'm just amazed |
I agree brother, and I've understood you ;), like they said, the spirits gather in their own circles. |
You wrote that you have benchmark results. Would be awesome if you could share them with us. |
@Timu57 After, I suggested to add it to the documentation page, so new comers undersrand the potential of SleekDB and adopt it quickly 💙 |
Any benchmarks for SleekDB exists? |
@Timu57 @rakibtg
Hi,
How about making a benchmark for SleekDB, for example, how many files, volume storage, and speed can SleekDB handle easily, it will be very beneficial for newcomers, to know approximately, what they can expect from SleekDB,
I know that this will deeply depend on the hardware configuration, and but can make a benchmark based on available characteristics, I can provide a hosted account for making these tests. or you can give me the code needed to do the tests, and I ll be very happy to run it on my VPS, so we can see the potential of SleekDB
best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: