-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Option for capital placement or just more reasonable default placement #26
Comments
Playing the new capital close to where the old one was indeed keeps it in the "danger zone". This somewhat forces the attacked player to defend it better in the next turn (if they can). Destroying the capital over and over again can be a strategy to defeat a player with a larger kingdom than you have. And indeed if you relied on the capital protecting your tiles, the new one still protects some of the same tiles. |
The ideal situation would be to give the player an option of where to place kingdom capitals in cases where new placements are necessary (the old capital being captured, the kingdom being split). But this would slow down the game significantly as each player potentially would have to be active in every enemy turn. But the way capitals get moved in the current version is definitely a disadvantage most of the time.
I don't have a clear suggestion on how to improve the situation, but I had a few thoughts that I wanted to share:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: