Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Integrals with lb > ub #141

Closed
ArnoStrouwen opened this issue Feb 7, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #231
Closed

Integrals with lb > ub #141

ArnoStrouwen opened this issue Feb 7, 2023 · 1 comment · Fixed by #231

Comments

@ArnoStrouwen
Copy link
Member

Similar to how Inf bounds are handled, we should handle this case by an automatic transformation.
Particularly because the Inf bound handling implicitly assumes that lb < ub, and integrals from +inf to a might give incorrect results.
@ygol55
Copy link

ygol55 commented Mar 3, 2023

I'm pretty sure that's not supported for a reason, while I couldn't found cases where the lower bound is higher then the higher bound. I guess that's just isn't needed (meaning for infinite positive lower bound).

@lxvm lxvm mentioned this issue Feb 12, 2024
Merged
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Refactor infinity substitution lxvm/Integrals.jl
2 participants
@ArnoStrouwen @ygol55