Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integration of CDAC terminology server #59

Open
Tracked by #81
dileep-ehr opened this issue Nov 17, 2017 · 5 comments
Open
Tracked by #81

Integration of CDAC terminology server #59

dileep-ehr opened this issue Nov 17, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@dileep-ehr
Copy link

We are planning to integrate the Opensource CDAC SNOMED CT server (https://cdac.in/index.aspx?id=hi_hs_medinfo_csno_overview) into PulseTile UI. The plan is to use the suggest/search and explore APIs provided by CSNOServ to populate the concepts from the UI screens. See this document for more details of the APIs.

The proposal is to run the CSNOServ as a separate service exposing REST APIs and do lookups directly form the UI. If any of you can think of a better mode of integration, please let us know.

@tony-shannon
Copy link
Member

thanks @dileep-ehr

Can I get a view from @robtweed @chevalleyc @jaykola on this please?

thanks
T

@tony-shannon
Copy link
Member

@freshehr can I get view too!

@tony-shannon
Copy link
Member

BTW @dileep-ehr any thoughts on vendor neutral approaches
e.g. Have you looked at FHIR Terminology services interface on top of that solution?
https://www.hl7.org/fhir/terminology-service.html

Not my area of expertise but am aware of it..

@dileep-ehr
Copy link
Author

@RupaRao can you also join in the discussions

@dileep-ehr
Copy link
Author

@tony-shannon FHIR terminology service interface could be the long term solution, but will involve more effort to get a working solution in place. Once we have a working and deploy-able solution, we can consider extending the CDAC server with the FHIR terminology interface.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants