Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support parallel annotations of multiple sequences #1700

Open
kbressem opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Support parallel annotations of multiple sequences #1700

kbressem opened this issue Jun 7, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@kbressem
Copy link

kbressem commented Jun 7, 2024

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
We are working on a project where the interpretation of a pathological finding depends on the context of multiple MRI sequences. Specifically we need a T2 weighted fat saturated sequence and a T1 weighted sequence. Sometimes a third sequence might even be needed. Currently MONAILabel and Slicer do only support annotations of a single 3D volume.

Describe the solution you'd like
Annotation of multiple sequences, ideally in different windows that are synced with each other.

Describe alternatives you've considered
One can manually load images to ITK-SNAP. If multiple ITK-SNAP windows are opened, it will sync across the sequences. This is our current solution, but requires a lot of manual effort.

Additional context
This is our current workflow with an example segmentation.
image

The images are synced across the two ITK-SNAP windows, the segmentations are done manually.

@diazandr3s
Copy link
Collaborator

diazandr3s commented Jul 5, 2024

Hi @kbressem,

I fully agree this feature is very much needed for several use cases: Mutlisequence and multilable tasks.

As far I understand, this is mostly a GUI feature - MONAI Label (server itself) has all APIs needed for this.

We should also add here that all sequences should be aligned or co-registered and of the same resolution?

Please let us know your thoughts.

@kbressem
Copy link
Author

kbressem commented Jul 6, 2024

Hi @diazandr3s,
yes it is mostly an GUI issue. I believe it would be beneficial if the image volumes can be aligned, but it should not be mandatory.
I am also not sure if one should do just a single annotation that is mapped to all sequences, or of the possibility for multiple annotation should be allowed. I see usecases for both.
Mapping a segmentation to multiple images saves time, but there might be alignment issues. Sometimes, especially in out current project, certain pathologies are only seen in a single MRI sequence, but to correctly interpret them, additional information from other sequences is needed.

@diazandr3s
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for clarifying, @kbressem.
I think BRATS is one of the use cases - all modalities are aligned and some regions are better highlighted in certain sequences/modalities.
I'd suggest starting with the assumption that the sequences are aligned. Some viewers have registration algos available

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants