Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

look into ancp bids #233

Open
mattcieslak opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

look into ancp bids #233

mattcieslak opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
@mattcieslak @scovitz

Comments

@mattcieslak
Copy link
Contributor

mattcieslak commented Sep 1, 2022 •
edited
Loading

See how their layout compares, maybe run some speed tests on datalad-enabled bids datasets
@Remi-Gau
Copy link

FYI there is WIP on the pybids front to incorporate ancp-bids layout to benefit from the speed bump

bids-standard/pybids#863
bids-standard/pybids#851

not sure when this will happen but thought I would let you know

@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Dec 19, 2022

Oscar and Chris seem to have made a lot of progress on the integration, so hopefully the faster version of pybids will become available at some point early next year.

@scovitz
Copy link
Contributor

scovitz commented Feb 15, 2023

Keeping this issue open, definitely a roadmap item for us!

@tsalo
Copy link
Member

tsalo commented Sep 8, 2023 •
edited
Loading

With 0.16.2, pybids should be 2-2.5x faster on large datasets.

There's also Greg Kiar and Connor Lane's new bids2table tool, which might fit with CuBIDS better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@mattcieslak mattcieslak

@scovitz scovitz

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@mattcieslak @Remi-Gau @tsalo @scovitz