-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Boundary quotes #48
Comments
Not slow at all - it was only just pushed and it's not in a tagged release yet. I did that because it was flagged as a warning in the IETF's msglint MIME checker and the way that boundaries are generated means we can be sure they never need quoting. Any value element in a header should be a RFC 2183 says:
It would be better if we had a generic formatter for values in headers as it's a bit random at present. |
I've done some more experiments and looked at how other email creators treat quotes on boundary definitions and decided to restore them. The way I'm treating filenames in content-dispositions is consistent with other mailers, so that will stay. |
Fixed in c11c5af |
Maybe slowpoke but happened to notice the boundaries are not enclose in quotes any more.
RFC 1521 - 7.2.1. : "This is not always necessary, but never hurts."
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="gc0p4Jq0M:2Yt08jU534c0p"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: