Explicitly define camera parameters rather than infer thru feature matching? #210
claytonrothschild
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
It should work something like that, if I understand you correctly:
and then
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
If I know the transformation matrix of the camera for each photo, is there a way I can skip the feature matching step? Any insights appreciated.
Thank you.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions