Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve confusing "Relative References in URIs" / "Relative References in URLs" section titles and wording #3545

Closed
handrews opened this issue Feb 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
clarification requests to clarify, but not change, part of the spec re-use: ref/id resolution how $ref, operationId, or anything else is resolved
Milestone

Comments

@handrews
Copy link
Member

handrews commented Feb 2, 2024

These sections are quite hard to parse. The URIs section applies to all forms of $ref and operationRef. The URLs section applies to URLs in the Server (and by extension, Paths) Objects. Some other places are unclear (see #1701, for example).

@handrews handrews added clarification requests to clarify, but not change, part of the spec re-use: ref/id resolution how $ref, operationId, or anything else is resolved labels Feb 2, 2024
@handrews handrews added this to the v3.1.1 milestone Feb 2, 2024
@handrews handrews self-assigned this Feb 2, 2024
@handrews handrews changed the title Improve confusing "Relative Refernces in URIs" / "Relative References in URLs" section titles and wording Improve confusing "Relative References in URIs" / "Relative References in URLs" section titles and wording Feb 18, 2024
@handrews
Copy link
Member Author

PR merged to 3.1.1. We'll sync up 3.2.0 after 3.1.1 and 3.0.4 are more-or-less done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
clarification requests to clarify, but not change, part of the spec re-use: ref/id resolution how $ref, operationId, or anything else is resolved
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant