Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ophis: 0-unstable-2019-04-13 -> 2.2-unstable-2024-07-28 #343825

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@AndersonTorres AndersonTorres marked this pull request as ready for review September 23, 2024 02:01
@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/4626

@nixos-discourse
Copy link

This pull request has been mentioned on NixOS Discourse. There might be relevant details there:

https://discourse.nixos.org/t/prs-ready-for-review/3032/4809

@Aleksanaa
Copy link
Member

@ofborg ophis

@phanirithvij
Copy link
Member

phanirithvij commented Nov 7, 2024

I'm just curious, why let self = ...; in self syntax? I mean in this specific package.

@AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member Author

Because I don't like rec and finalAttrs design pattern is not available.

@wegank wegank added the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Nov 10, 2024
@AndersonTorres AndersonTorres removed the 2.status: merge conflict This PR has merge conflicts with the target branch label Nov 21, 2024
@AndersonTorres
Copy link
Member Author

@ofborg build ophis

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants