python311Packages.rfeed, python312Packages.rfeed: init at 1.1.1 #315113
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
By the way, according to https://github.com/egorsmkv/rfeed, which is linked in Pypi to rfeed, it's unmaintained for 8 years and has been archived since 2022. Should it be added to nixpkgs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's a rather small package but it provides a nice API that I'm personally using. As far as I'm aware it hasn't been updated because no changes have needed to be made, which is kinda the idea when it comes to software. It doesn't do any networking itself so there are no possible security vulnerabilities there.
| @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ | |||
| { lib | |||
| , buildPythonPackage | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please format with the new formatter.
| --replace-fail distutils.core setuptools | ||
| ''; | ||
| meta = { | ||
| description = "Extensible RSS 2.0 Feed Generator written in Python."; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| description = "Extensible RSS 2.0 Feed Generator written in Python."; | |
| description = "Extensible RSS 2.0 Feed Generator"; |
| downloadPage = "https://github.com/egorsmkv/rfeed/releases"; | ||
| homepage = "https://github.com/egorsmkv/rfeed"; | ||
| license = lib.licenses.mit; | ||
| maintainers = with lib.maintainers; [ ]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
New packages must have a maintainer.
Description of changes
https://github.com/svpino/rfeed
In my opinion, I prefer rfeed to
feedgenor other packages.Things done
nix.conf? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxedsandbox = truenix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.