Refactor the storage and access of cached elements #608
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sadielbartholomew
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2023
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The change from 'nth_element' to index value representing the element's array position is very sensible (and natural, not sure why neither of us picked up on that as a better way in the original implementation!).
I've raised a few questions and minor comments but otherwise everything is good to go, so please consider those and then merge when ready. Thanks.
Co-authored-by: Sadie L. Bartholomew <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sadie L. Bartholomew <[email protected]>
sadielbartholomew
approved these changes
Mar 6, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was nothing particularly wrong with the original code, but the upcoming PR on CFA needs more performant and flexible approach.