Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

standardize job name, commands #107

Open
loriab opened this issue Jul 18, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

standardize job name, commands #107

loriab opened this issue Jul 18, 2019 · 0 comments

Comments

@loriab
Copy link
Collaborator

loriab commented Jul 18, 2019

two items for a standardization pass:

  • (A) insofar as programs allow, should we standardize on a filename in qcng? e.g., qcengine_job.[in|out|inp|nw|mop] so it's clearer what are placeholders vs. runtime details.

  • (B) commands and extra_commands are deceptive in that while one can have arguments aplenty, qcng.util.execute is adamant about running only one command. propose singularizing for clarity.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant