Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Inference results of 640x1600 model is abnormal #49

Open
Serenade-ajp opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 7 comments
Open

Inference results of 640x1600 model is abnormal #49

Serenade-ajp opened this issue Sep 1, 2022 · 7 comments

Comments

@Serenade-ajp
Copy link

The config params of 640x1600 model is as follows:
final_dim = (640, 1600)
backbone_conf['final_dim'] = final_dim
ida_aug_conf['final_dim'] = final_dim
ida_aug_conf['resize_lim'] = (0.94, 1.25)
The inference results is strange, only the instance in CAM_BACK fov seems to be normal, while objects in other cam's fov tend to miss a certain scale
image

@Serenade-ajp
Copy link
Author

More strangely, another 640x1600 model behaves in the opposite way
image
And the only difference of the two models is : the first one use bev res 256x256, while the later one use 128x128

@yinchimaoliang
Copy link
Collaborator

Have you changed train_cfg, test_cfg and bbox_coder accordingly?

@Serenade-ajp
Copy link
Author

You mean changing 'out_size_factor' when change bev res from 128x128 to 256x256 ? we have done this.
what is strange is that some cam fov is normal while others are not good, if some config params are wrongly set, what kind of params can make the different behavior of different cams?

@Serenade-ajp
Copy link
Author

And the 640x1600, 128x128 model is modified from your 'bev_depth_lss_r50_256x704_128x128_20e_cbgs_2key.py', the only difference is change following params:
final_dim = (640, 1600)
backbone_conf['final_dim'] = final_dim
ida_aug_conf['final_dim'] = final_dim
ida_aug_conf['resize_lim'] = (0.94, 1.25)

@MalignusCN
Copy link

The config params of 640x1600 model is as follows: final_dim = (640, 1600) backbone_conf['final_dim'] = final_dim ida_aug_conf['final_dim'] = final_dim ida_aug_conf['resize_lim'] = (0.94, 1.25) The inference results is strange, only the instance in CAM_BACK fov seems to be normal, while objects in other cam's fov tend to miss a certain scale image

Hi~ your visualization is awesome, but I didn't find any visualization in BEVDepth's repo. Is your visualization codes available? thx a lot

@pummi823
Copy link

Hi! I want to know where (which file?) you change the bev res from 128x128 to 256x256 ? I can not found it T T. Best wishes!!

@yukaizhou
Copy link

And the 640x1600, 128x128 model is modified from your 'bev_depth_lss_r50_256x704_128x128_20e_cbgs_2key.py', the only difference is change following params: final_dim = (640, 1600) backbone_conf['final_dim'] = final_dim ida_aug_conf['final_dim'] = final_dim ida_aug_conf['resize_lim'] = (0.94, 1.25)

Hello, I also encountered this problem and only made the same modification on the original code. Have you solved this problem? I have been troubled by this problem for a long time, looking forward to your reply.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants