Flexible nesting of groups

[villanueval]

Can the group listing be updated to be more flexible, and granular, by having the option of more than 2 levels? This would make it easier to display something closer to the real taxonomic groupings.

So instead of having:

• Vertebrates
  • Birds
  • Mammals
  • Reptiles
  • Turtles

We could have something like:

• Vertebrates
  • Birds
    • Waterfowl
    • Songbirds
  • Mammals
    • Marine mammals
      • Dolphins and Whales
      • Manatees and Dugongs
    • Bats
  • Reptiles
    • Marine Turtles
    • Non-marine Turtles
    • Snakes

[funkycoda]

Isn't this where the family comes in?

[robgur]

Family is pretty granular. Order would work better (for me). I'd table this for a bit - needs more discussion.

…

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Ajay Ranipeta ***@***.***> wrote: Isn't this where the family comes in? — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#71 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAcc7J9WNC8n5P-1pgRuBLBKZuetRrh_ks5rhFGBgaJpZM4MOgWE> .

[funkycoda]

Agree with @robgur. Needs more discussion. Mobile (or web UX) might be a bit painful.

[villanueval]

Was just asking to get an idea of possibilities for future development. Will leave for later.