Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The MNIST model seems to deep/complexe #324

Open
arthurPignet opened this issue Jan 21, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

The MNIST model seems to deep/complexe #324

arthurPignet opened this issue Jan 21, 2021 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@arthurPignet
Copy link
Collaborator

The MNIST nn have 1,199,882 parameters, for an accuracy of 0.9893 +/- 0.01 (keras fit, epochs=12, batch_size=168)

To compare with, the cifar model have 1,250,858 parameters, and reach 0.7888 +/- 0.03 accuracy in epochs=20, batch_size=140

I am not sure but I think we can either optimize our optimization parameters for MNIST and reach 0.999 acc, or decide that is not really useful in our case and go for a smaller/faster model ?

@arthurPignet arthurPignet added the question Further information is requested label Jan 21, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant