Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Heads up about test error on 1.3 #21

Closed
KristofferC opened this issue Sep 6, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Heads up about test error on 1.3 #21

KristofferC opened this issue Sep 6, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@KristofferC
Copy link

When testing this package against the upcoming 1.3 release, the following test error occured:

Error During Test at /root/.julia/packages/KrylovKit/kSkwM/test/linalg.jl:57
  Got exception outside of a @test
  MethodError: no method matching hschur!(::UpperHessenberg{Float32,Array{Float32,2}})
  ...
  Stacktrace:
   [1] top-level scope at /root/.julia/packages/KrylovKit/kSkwM/test/linalg.jl:61
   [2] top-level scope at /workspace/srcdir/julia/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.3/Test/src/Test.jl:1180
   [3] top-level scope at /root/.julia/packages/KrylovKit/kSkwM/test/linalg.jl:57
   [4] top-level scope at /workspace/srcdir/julia/usr/share/julia/stdlib/v1.3/Test/src/Test.jl:1107
   [5] top-level scope at /root/.julia/packages/KrylovKit/kSkwM/test/linalg.jl:57
   [6] include at ./boot.jl:328 [inlined]
   [7] include_relative(::Module, ::String) at ./loading.jl:1105
   [8] include(::Module, ::String) at ./Base.jl:31
   [9] include(::String) at ./client.jl:432
   [10] top-level scope at /root/.julia/packages/KrylovKit/kSkwM/test/runtests.jl:19
   [11] include at ./boot.jl:328 [inlined]
   [12] include_relative(::Module, ::String) at ./loading.jl:1105
   [13] include(::Module, ::String) at ./Base.jl:31
   [14] include(::String) at ./client.jl:432
   [15] top-level scope at none:6
   [16] eval(::Module, ::Any) at ./boot.jl:330
   [17] exec_options(::Base.JLOptions) at ./client.jl:271
   [18] _start() at ./client.jl:468

This is likely due to the PR JuliaLang/julia#31853 introducing the new UpperHessenberg type returned from some functions. Adding a specialization here might be enough to fix it.

@Jutho
Copy link
Owner

Jutho commented Sep 6, 2019

Thanks; that's easily fixed but now I run up against a bug in julia master, which I reported in this existing thread:

JuliaLang/julia#33105

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants