You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is something about the initial interval having an (unstable) equilibrium point inside. If we include 0 in the initial interval, at some point things go wrong. If 0..0 is the initial point for the expansion, so the initial interval is symmetric around zero, then we get an error: "Minimum tolerance reached" before finishing the integration. If the interval is asymmetric, the integration may finish but the flowpipe obtained is wrong, or simply the error bounds of the Taylor expansion become useless (-Inf .. Inf).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
(copied here from another discussion)
Something odd happens near 0. Mincing the initial interval gives answers that look better
If the interval of interest is
1 .. 2
, or any other not containing 0, the integrator behaves properly.There is something about the initial interval having an (unstable) equilibrium point inside. If we include
0
in the initial interval, at some point things go wrong. If0..0
is the initial point for the expansion, so the initial interval is symmetric around zero, then we get an error: "Minimum tolerance reached" before finishing the integration. If the interval is asymmetric, the integration may finish but the flowpipe obtained is wrong, or simply the error bounds of the Taylor expansion become useless (-Inf .. Inf
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: