You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Running ?Base.getproperty prints a long help text on extracting factors of above two factorizations. This is the wrong place for those to be: if I would look for them I would not type ?Base.getproperty and if I type ?Base.getproperty I certainly am not interested in those. They probably should be moved to the documentation of the types themselves, which is currently empty.
(Also, the types in some of the doc-strings are outdated due to stdlib-move)
I feel like we don't need have docstrings for getproperty on those. Can't we just document the F.L etc accessors in the docstring for the factorization?
Running
?Base.getproperty
prints a long help text on extracting factors of above two factorizations. This is the wrong place for those to be: if I would look for them I would not type?Base.getproperty
and if I type?Base.getproperty
I certainly am not interested in those. They probably should be moved to the documentation of the types themselves, which is currently empty.(Also, the types in some of the doc-strings are outdated due to stdlib-move)
X-ref: #25184
(Add Doc and LinearAlgebra labels)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: