We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dimension_mismatch_fail()
Currently the function dimension_mismatch_fail(SA::Type, a::AbstractArray) does not specialize on the SA parameter, which makes code that uses StaticArrays inside GPU kernels incompatible (unless @inbounds is used in front of the constructor/convert statements). See the discussion here: https://discourse.julialang.org/t/problems-with-linearalgebra-functions-within-kernelabstractions-and-cuda/97566/5
dimension_mismatch_fail(SA::Type, a::AbstractArray)
SA
Would it be ok to force specialization on the SA parameter? I could provide a quick PR.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Resolved by #1245
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Currently the function
dimension_mismatch_fail(SA::Type, a::AbstractArray)
does not specialize on theSA
parameter, which makes code that uses StaticArrays inside GPU kernels incompatible (unless @inbounds is used in front of the constructor/convert statements).See the discussion here: https://discourse.julialang.org/t/problems-with-linearalgebra-functions-within-kernelabstractions-and-cuda/97566/5
Would it be ok to force specialization on the
SA
parameter? I could provide a quick PR.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: