You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
there are a few other regularized forms of Lasso / ElasticNet I would find useful, like group lasso, trend filtering, generalized lasso (& generalized Tikhonov). is this compatible with existing design of solvers?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hmm so if I'm not mistaken some of what you describe comes down to a penalty that looks like $\sum_i P_i(\Gamma_i\theta) $ where $\theta$ is the vector of coefficients, $P_i$ are basic penalisations that are mostly already there and $\Gamma_i$ is some matrix e.g. that masks a set of the vector or whatever (e.g. TV would be another one).
I think that for that kind of penalty, the extension should be fairly straightforward with a lot of re-use of existing code.
For even more generic stuff (e.g. if someone was interested in actually solving an Lp penalty with 0<=p<1) this will typically require ad-hoc solvers and while it might be in scope, it would expand the code surface to maintain quite a bit. I'd say let's discuss case by case?
there are a few other regularized forms of Lasso / ElasticNet I would find useful, like group lasso, trend filtering, generalized lasso (& generalized Tikhonov). is this compatible with existing design of solvers?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: