You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently e.g. given a propagator with crossover followed by single point mutation, each with a set probability:
First crossover is applied with its probability and then mutation with an independent probability.
If in the end no propagator was applied, then a completely new individual is randomly generated.
This skews the statistics and might not be what the user expects.
We should either organize the propagator differently to behave closer to expectation and/or communicate the resulting statistics more clearly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently e.g. given a propagator with crossover followed by single point mutation, each with a set probability:
First crossover is applied with its probability and then mutation with an independent probability.
If in the end no propagator was applied, then a completely new individual is randomly generated.
This skews the statistics and might not be what the user expects.
We should either organize the propagator differently to behave closer to expectation and/or communicate the resulting statistics more clearly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: