Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rad Pro: J613 tube conversion factor #89

Closed
TzOk83 opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Rad Pro: J613 tube conversion factor #89

TzOk83 opened this issue May 30, 2024 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@TzOk83
Copy link

TzOk83 commented May 30, 2024

I have noticed very low background radiation levels with this tube. In your description, I've found that you are using 64.8 cpm/µSv/h (9,5 cpm/mR/h) for both J613 and J614, but on the J614 datasheet I found online, they stated 5 cpm/mR/h, which is ~34,2 cpm/µSv/h. So I've set 33,9 cpm/µSv/h, and now my long-time average readings are more or less on par, with my old RKSB-104.

@Gissio Gissio changed the title Conversion factor for J613 GM tube Rad Pro: J613 tube conversion factor May 30, 2024
@Gissio
Copy link
Owner

Gissio commented May 30, 2024

Could you please share the link to the J614 datasheet?

Supposing the HH614 is similiar to the J614 (they also look alike), according to https://github.com/Gissio/radpro/blob/main/docs/tubes/HH614.jpg, the conversion factor should be 10 cps/mR/h.

In general, it is a bad idea to compare background levels of different tubes, as the tubes themselves emit radiation. It would be more appropriate to compare the radiation levels with a test source.

Update: I think I found it in Rad Pro's own repository: https://github.com/Gissio/radpro/blob/main/docs/tubes/J-tube%20properties.pdf. Now the question is: what is the correct conversion factor?

@TzOk83
Copy link
Author

TzOk83 commented May 30, 2024

The one from Rad Pro is the one I've also seen, it is sometimes labeled G-M World. Nevertheless, when I enter 33.9 cpm/µSv/h I have readings ~0.1 uSv/h, which correspond to hourly updated National Atomic Agency reports for background radiation in my area (0.091 uSv/h). My RKSB-104 gives readings between 0.09 and 0.120 uSv/h. With the default setting, I've got roughly half of that reading.

j614g

@Gissio
Copy link
Owner

Gissio commented May 30, 2024

Excellent observation. Will be updated in the next release. Thanks a lot.

@Gissio Gissio closed this as completed May 30, 2024
@Gissio Gissio added the enhancement New feature or request label May 31, 2024
@TzOk83
Copy link
Author

TzOk83 commented Jun 1, 2024

cps/mR/h to cpm/uSv/h conversion is 1 cps/mR/h = 6 cpm/uSv/h (you seem to use a value of 6.84 in your conversions), so 5 cps/mR/h = 30 cpm/uSv/h. After 24h background radiation comparisons with RKSB-104 (dual SBM-20 tubes, no averaging, just a simple rule, that counts during 280 sec. = nS/h) this is the best sensitivity value for my unit.

@Gissio
Copy link
Owner

Gissio commented Jun 1, 2024

Ok!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants