Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Curate a list of PyGMT community contributions #1059

Closed
weiji14 opened this issue Mar 14, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #1210
Closed

Curate a list of PyGMT community contributions #1059

weiji14 opened this issue Mar 14, 2021 · 7 comments · Fixed by #1210
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation feature request New feature wanted good first issue Good for newcomers
Milestone

Comments

@weiji14
Copy link
Member

weiji14 commented Mar 14, 2021

Description of the desired feature

Team, what do people think about adding a "User Contributions" section on the sidebar (similar to https://docs.generic-mapping-tools.org/6.1/users-contrib-scripts.html). I think there's a lot of good examples (from workshops/papers/posters/etc) floating out there in the wild and it would be good to have a place to link to some of them

Some examples that I know of (feel free to edit and add to the list):

Alternatively, we could setup an 'awesome-pygmt' page (see https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome) if we think there will be a lot of these, and just have a link to it on the sidebar.

Are you willing to help implement and maintain this feature? Need some input from people :)

@weiji14 weiji14 added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation feature request New feature wanted labels Mar 14, 2021
@seisman
Copy link
Member

seisman commented Mar 17, 2021

I think a list of links in the PyGMT documentation is enough. A separate awesome-pygmt repository and site mean more maintenance burden on us.

@weiji14 weiji14 added the good first issue Good for newcomers label Mar 17, 2021
@willschlitzer
Copy link
Contributor

willschlitzer commented Mar 17, 2021

Are you envisioning this as just PyGMT-focused tutorial/posters/papers, or including geoscience (and other -science) work that uses PyGMT figures?

@michaelgrund
Copy link
Member

michaelgrund commented Mar 17, 2021

I think a list of links in the PyGMT documentation is enough. A separate awesome-pygmt repository and site mean more maintenance burden on us.

Agree with @seisman. I think a list of links is sufficient.

Are you envisioning this as just PyGMT-focused tutorial/posters/papers, or including geoscience (and other -science) work that uses PyGMT figures?

I would also add everything that uses PyGMT/GMT to produce high-quality figures and plots.

@seisman
Copy link
Member

seisman commented Mar 22, 2021

Do we need to ask for permissions if we want to add any repositories/websites to the list?

@michaelgrund
Copy link
Member

Do we need to ask for permissions if we want to add any repositories/websites to the list?

Not sure, e.g. ObsPy lists several extensions to the main package etc. on their GitHub page. Maybe we do it in a similar way or ask them how they handle it.

@seisman
Copy link
Member

seisman commented Mar 22, 2021

At least most of the tutorials/examples are owned by our project maintainers/contributors. So at least we can list these sites and ask users to contribute more to the list:

@seisman seisman changed the title Ideas for curating a list of PyGMT community contributions Curate a list of PyGMT community contributions Apr 2, 2021
@seisman seisman pinned this issue Apr 2, 2021
@seisman
Copy link
Member

seisman commented Apr 14, 2021

@GenericMappingTools/pygmt-contributors I just added these resources in PR #1210. Please leave your comments there.

@seisman seisman added this to the 0.4.0 milestone Apr 20, 2021
@seisman seisman unpinned this issue Apr 20, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation feature request New feature wanted good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants