-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 353
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modules that should take -l for auto-legend building #1973
Labels
feature request
Request a new feature
Comments
@PaulWessel No need to have "6.1" in the title. You can add this issue to the "6.1.0" milestone. |
PaulWessel
changed the title
[6.1] Modules that should take -l for auto-legend building
Modules that should take -l for auto-legend building
Nov 3, 2019
Slowly learning GitHub... |
xref #442 (comment), which requests auto-legend support for custom symbols in plot. |
3 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Description of the desired feature
Looking at all the modules that produce plots, I think this is the list that may need -l:
For contours the proposed option was -l[annotlabel]/[contourlabel] in order to allow one or both lines.
I have excluded modules like coast and wiggle since not likely to need legends (?).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: