Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

how does llvm-pretty compare with llvm-hs or llvm-general? #10

Closed
minad opened this issue Mar 8, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

how does llvm-pretty compare with llvm-hs or llvm-general? #10

minad opened this issue Mar 8, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@minad
Copy link

minad commented Mar 8, 2017

No description provided.

@elliottt
Copy link
Collaborator

elliottt commented Mar 8, 2017

I think that the major difference is that it's explicitly not using the llvm library. Originally, its purpose was to provide an easy way of producing textual llvm source, via an EDSL for constructing an AST, and a pretty printer for that AST. It's scope has increased a bit since then, and there's now a parser for the bitcode format that's maintained separately.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants