Regarding engine forks and whatnot

[doggogit]

Alright, I believe we should be a little harsh when it comes to engine forks.

Any engine forks that include not that many QoL changes, have miscellaneous changes (like a new HUD) that can be made with a script within 5 to 10 minutes, should be automatically rejected.

There are, obviously, exception, for example: the Raltyro Psych Fork, Pluma's Psych Fork and others that I can't think of at the top of my head.

(feel free to pin this btw)

[BombasticTom]

Custom Psych Engine too!!

(this is a joke, it doesn't have any progress cuz i've stopped working on it months ago)

[ninjamuffin99]

more or less i think. if someone looks at the changes, and they dont think they are super incredible awesome or interesting , can be rejected

[Burgerballs]

Most of the stuff they add (specifically psych forks) are already replicated in lua by the base Psych community too.

[BombasticTom]

damn, didn't know that. the only fork i know of (os engine) changes some menu stuff and adds new options (that i personally think are too much)

[Burgerballs]

damn, didn't know that. the only fork i know of (os engine) changes some menu stuff and adds new options (that i personally think are too much)

I checked the os engine readme and yeah all of the OS Engine features (other than the menus) can be recreated in base Psych 0.6.3, including shaders lol

[BombasticTom]

There's a lot of psych ports just using lua scripts (lmao)

[Burgerballs]

There's a lot of psych ports just using lua scripts (lmao)

Most of them aren't theirs either too

[doggogit]

more or less i think. if someone looks at the changes, and they dont think they are super incredible awesome or interesting , can be rejected

I feel like a section related to this should be added to the Code of Conduct file

[Burgerballs]

more or less i think. if someone looks at the changes, and they dont think they are super incredible awesome or interesting , can be rejected

I feel like a section related to this should be added to the Code of Conduct file

https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome/blob/main/awesome.md
"Research if the stuff you're including is actually awesome."

[doggogit]

more or less i think. if someone looks at the changes, and they dont think they are super incredible awesome or interesting , can be rejected

I feel like a section related to this should be added to the Code of Conduct file

https://github.com/sindresorhus/awesome/blob/main/awesome.md "Research if the stuff you're including is actually awesome."

Only a suggestion, but fair enough, should've probably read the manifesto and stuff lol

[doggogit]

Should this issue be closed? I don't really know where to take this discussion from here, this was just for raising awareness, not gonna lie. It can be a pinned issue if possible.

[BombasticTom]

i think that the pinned issue should be the first one made (the Add Descriptions To Links? one)

[BombasticTom]

oh well lol

[doggogit]

Closing this as #51 resolves this issue.